Submitted by Raven’s Shadow
Marie sits on my knee at recess,
her hair, mangy, tangled, stiff,
flaps in the Decenber wind
like a plastic racing flag.
Playground squeals
and creaking swings
force her to shout
in my ear what she wants
Santa to bring her
boots, a doll, some clothes,
a new coat and a mommy
that stays.
Submitted by Average Poet Blog
A girl that’s hot
and knows she’s hot
is one that leaves me cold
but one that’s hot
and thinks she’s not
is one I’m hot to hold.
Submitted by Knocking from Inside Blog
3 Word Wednesday: Bleak. Hiccup. Queer.
bleak monotony
hiccups into monadnock
what a queer mountain
Collection available! Knocking from Inside
Submitted by Knocking from Inside Blog
Oh I remember it well:
all week in the bitter frost the trains were crying out
“Don’t drive me so hard. Mercy, mercy,”
to the hand on the wheel.
And all over town the tender-hearted
wept for their lost ones and whispered
“Mercy, Beloved,”
to the hand on the wheel.
The earth groaned in her orbit
and the moon with her million meteor scars
wrote their pleas against the darkness: “Mercy!”
to the hand on the wheel.
As flour calls out to the mill
and stone to water: “Mercy!”
every living heart begs mercy
from the hand on the wheel.
Collection available! Knocking from Inside
Submitted by World Class Poetry Blog
Poets are getting more creative in how we promote ourselves. I’m glad to see it. I think this is going to be something we see more and more of in the future. Kate Greenstreet has moved us forward into the 21st century with this poetry video. I see these efforts only getting better:
the giant from Kate Greenstreet on Vimeo.
Submitted by Ted Burke Blog
Salon has started a rather fine film section in it’s redesign, and it was a surprise to see Chicago Reader movie critic Jonathan Rosenbaum highlighted in a brief piece defending to the defense of the Steven Spielberg’s maligned sci-fi meditation on the human soul, A.I.Artificial Intelligence. His defense of the feature , brave as it is, has the benefit of being a pithy:
Reading it simply as a Spielberg film, as most detractors do, or even trying to read it simply as a Kubrick film, is a pretty futile exercise with limited rewards, even though the fingerprints of both directors are all over it. Seeing it as a perpetually unresolved dialectic between Kubrick and Spielberg starts to yield a complicated kind of sense — an ambiguity where the bleakest pessimism and the most ecstatic kind of feel-good enchantment swiftly alternate and even occasionally blend, not to mention a far more enriching experience, however troubling and unresolved. As a profound meditation on the difference between what’s human and what isn’t, it also constitutes one of the best allegories about cinema that I know.I am glad someone thought this was a good movie. I had the good fortune to take a couple film courses with Jonathan Rosenbaum in the seventies when he was a visiting film lecturer in UC San Diego’s Visual Arts Department. The topic of one class, Paranoia in Films, was an especially engaging, if diffusely defined course, and it was of particular interest that the required text for the course was Gravity’s Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon, from which Mr. Rosenbaum would bestow cryptic quotes from the book like “God is the original conspiracy theory” while showing acutely observed studies in monomania such as Nick Ray’s Bigger than Life. That film in particular was apt for a course in paranoia on film, as it dealt with a meek school teacher’s growing dependence of a mood altering medicine (cortisone) that converted into an arrogant, edgy, lunatic who needed eventually to be placed in a straight jacket. The print Rosenbaum received for the class wasn’t the theatrical print he expected, but rather the cropped version, intended for television screens, where much of the image was cut away and the focus was on the talking heads. Viewing a tightly contained James Mason screaming larger than life on a large auditorium screen made you feel like you were watching someone trying to escape from a shrinking glass box. Paranoid indeed.
It’s with this back story that I understand his appreciation of A.I.:Artificial Intelligence, but where he sees a brave vision from Steven Spielberg in the way he attempts to sort through the ways technology threatens to blur and eventually erase the distinctions between human and android programming–the eventual point was that both these creations are subject to a hard wiring that needs to bond with others as a defense against the lurking solitude–but it remains for me a vague, grandstanding mess. The buzz was that this was intended as the last film Stanley Kubrick was to make but never got to, and that Spielberg had gained access to the notes and developed his own ideas about how to flesh out, so to speak, the bare premise. Kubrick , is not the best person to pick if you’re in the market for a useful idea for a film; more than a few of us have felt that the late director’s reputation was inflated beyond sane justification, a man who could indeed shoot an engrossing sequence but was ill at ease to explain what thinking lay behind his imagery. It was a matter of monumental style in Kubrick’s films, and he’s lucky enough to make a hand ful of movies that haven’t had their reputations collapse after their initial release and the wave of awestruck reviews.
His final movie, Eyes Wide Shut, was as pompous and preposterous a botched project as anything Ed Wood had made; you suspect that he had actually died before he had a chance to repair the raw feed in post production. Even the director’s skill for making capable actors appear like sleepwalkers wasn’t enough to calm the antsy Tom Cruise; he remains within his emotional range as an over-eyed wind-up toy. AI,in kind, was a half a bad idea from Kubrick’s mind, was was reason enough for Spielberg to pour on the effects, flash the lights, go crazy with the colors, with abrupt and unconsidered cuts between broad humor, family hour sweetness and uncorked violence and villainy. The last set of clauses sound like a Coen Brothers movie, sure, but the Coens have a tone that runs through through their vexing genre variations and character studies; there are links, there are connections, there are matters in the frames that can be discussed, debated, but which are very tangibly present in the movie. Spielberg is muscle, flash, loud noises; his idea of subtext is a Cliffs Notes of discussion points–what morality play that can be discerned operates only on the surface, and it is when this happens–as it does all though this messy, ill-lit narrative–that you realize what button-pushing schlock meister the director really is. The whole A.I. enterprise comes off like that horribly cropped scene of James Mason yelling on an auditorium screen. Nothing at all fits the slim premise.
Submitted by Knocking from Inside Blog
When twenty years had gone the musketeers were reunited
for one adventure, after which their fellowship divided.
Porthos was a hero, Athos had a dream
D’Artagnan was a soldier, Aramis had a scheme.
Oh Lord, we carried on and on for years
just like the musketeers
just like the musketeers.
We give too much into the care of strangely absent friends
as if we don’t remember how the story always ends:
Porthos under stone, D’Artagnan on a mission
Athos of a broken heart, Aramis in suspicion.
Oh Lord, it seems we’re victims of the years
just like the musketeers
just like the musketeers.
It’s age and time that make the world a place of solemn strangers
and habit killed the hearts that had defied the worst of dangers.
Porthos never changed, but Aramis was colder
D’Artagnan soldiered on while Athos just got older.
Oh Lord, deliver us from endless years
just like the musketeers
just like the musketeers.
Collection available! Knocking from Inside
Submitted by Knocking from Inside Blog
When twenty years had gone the musketeers were reunited
for one adventure, after which their fellowship divided.
Porthos was a hero, Athos had a dream
D’Artagnan was a soldier, Aramis had a scheme.
Oh Lord, we carried on and on for years
just like the musketeers
just like the musketeers.
We give too much into the care of strangely absent friends
as if we don’t remember how the story always ends:
Porthos under stone, D’Artagnan on a mission
Athos of a broken heart, Aramis in suspicion.
Oh Lord, it seems we’re victims of the years
just like the musketeers
just like the musketeers.
It’s age and time that make the world a place of solemn strangers
and habit killed the hearts that had defied the worst of dangers.
Porthos never changed, but Aramis was colder
D’Artagnan soldiered on while Athos just got older.
Oh Lord, deliver us from endless years
just like the musketeers
just like the musketeers.
Collection available! Knocking from Inside
Submitted by Poets Who Blog
Leave a link to a poem about the holiday season. Everyone else go check out the poems and comment.
Submitted by World Class Poetry Blog
A few days ago I discovered a new poetry journal in the form of a blog. This appears to be the latest trend in online publishing and one I welcome and admire. The blog format is the perfect online format for ongoing publication and suits the journal just fine. I was impressed with Breadcrumb Sins, both its design and the quality of writing featured there. So I sent Phil Lane, the editor, a few poems. He published all of them.
It’s not all that common that you’ll find a journal that will print previously published material. But it clearly states in the guidelines that Breadcrumb Sins will accept previously published poems. I sent them one that had been published in my local newspaper and I’ve been wanting to get it a wider distribution. I believe it’s one of my best poems. Phil loved it. Thanks Phil!
“Old Goth” is the title of the poem. You can read it along with two others – “Nocturne: Battlefield Sonnet” and “The Markets” – at Breadcrumb Sins (direct link). Be sure to rate the poems using the stars at the top of the page.
On another note, World Class Poetry is in transition. I’ve got some new changes coming at the beginning of the year. As a result of my focus on moving this blog and World Class Poetry into a new direction, I’ll be posting less frequently until the changes are complete. Thanks for reading!
Submitted by Ted Burke Blog
Strange, it seems, that this December we must consider not only the best books of 2009 , but the best books of the decade, and shudder at the thought that the last ten years have gone by so quickly. Or have they? Thinking back on the events gone by, personal, political, economic, literary, through each bit of bad news, good news and indifferent reports, one does realize, finally,that it’s been a full decade in the passing. It’s as though one had fallen asleep in the backseat during a long, tedious trip , only to be woken up with a start when the car finally stops. Coming out of the fog, one hazily asks “Here already?”
But we are here, ready or not for the next decade, ready or not in one’s attempts to secure a sound employment ( too much detail, perhaps, but I was laid off my job last week, but I’m in noble company). My best guess to that matter is that we are ready; there have been some terrific books written over the last ten years , some brilliant writing, intriguing tales, illuminating accounts of emotion and fancy, all of which serves the central purpose of literature, to help us think about ourselves in the world.
These books have kept me out of the vacuum of merely sitting in front of a computer grazing off the headlines –they have kept me engaged with the world for the last ten years and have given me ample reason to talk to old friends and make new ones. We have something to talk about, and that seems to be the point of reading books and sharing what one enjoys with others; books are the grounds through which our different lives find a common set of metaphors , through which we can discuss surmount of differences and frame our similarities.
My best books of the Last Decade. These remarks, of course, are culled from previously posted reviews.
My Vocabulary Did this To Me
poems by Jack Spicer
Spicer is an interesting poet on several levels, all of them deep and rich with deposits that reward an earnest dig. He is , I think, on a par with Wallace Stevens and William Carlos Williams with the interest in grilling the elaborating infrastructure of how we draw or are drawn to specialized conclusions with the use of metaphor, and it is to his particular brilliance as a lyric poet, comparable to Frank O’Hara (a poet Spicer declared he didn’t care for, with O’Hara thinking much the same in kind) that the contradictions, competing desires and unexpected conundrums of investigating one’s verbal stream are made comprehensible to the senses, a joy to the ear. No one, really no one wrote as distinctly as the long obscure Spicer did, and editors Gizzi, Killian and publisher Wesleyan Press are to be thanked for restoring a major American voice to our shared canon.
Bear v. Shark
a novel by Chris Batchelder
Bear V. Shark by Chris Bachelder is post-modern hoot. Don’t let the tag “post modern” put you off, because Bachelder gets it exactly right as he skews his target, television and the culture of Total Media Saturation. Bear V.Shark is a great, wild read for anyone who enjoyed Pastoralia or the work of Mark Leyner. There is a vaguely described though loudly trumpeted Big Event forthcoming that’s precisely what the title suggests, in a future time when TVs have no off switches and whose soft ware can sense a viewers boredom and flip the channels for them: TVs are everywhere in this world, in the kitchen, the furniture, bus stops, train stations, and in such a society, the idiom of everyday language is subverted by commercial patois and jingles. America, here, is subtly insane and in a constant state of distraction.This is the America that Baudrillard absent mindedly ruminated about, only much funnier, edgier, and smarter in the evisceration
Cosmopolis
a novel by Don DeLillo
Don DeLillo again shows that he’s our best novelist of American absurdity with this strange off-kilter comedy that centers around the events of an eventful day in Manhattan. Against a backdrop of raves, a Presidential motorcade, a rock star’s funeral, mysterious street demonstrations and the constant, ghostly electronic feed of news of pending financial disaster, a young billionaire asset manager limousines uptown to get a haircut in order to embrace his sense of inevitable, personal apocalypse. DeLillo’s writing is outstanding, funny with a cool lyricism, poetic when you least expect it. The brillance here, as with White Noise and especially Mao ll is the way characters seek to reconfigure their metaphors, their assuring base of references , once their world view is rattled and made less authortative by unexplainable events and human quirks. This is semiotics at its best, an erotic activity where DeLillo probes and glides over the surfaces of ideas , notions, theories and their artifacts, things intellectual and material emptied of meaning, purpose. It’s a hallmark of DeLillo’s mastery of language that he gets that psychic activity that constantly tries to reinfuse the world with meaning and purpose after the constructions are laid bare; Eric, here in this world of commodity trading, which he regards as natural force that he’s mastered and control, attempts to reintroduce mystery into the world he is trapped in. He is bored beyond the grave with the results of his luck. His efforts to live dangerously , spontaneously and thus get a perception he hadn’t had and perhaps secure a hint of a metaphysical infrastructure that eludes, all turn badly, but for DeLillo’s art it’s not what is found , discovered, or resolved through the extensions of language, but rather the journey itself, the constant connecting of things with other things in the world; this is the poetry of the human need to make sense of things in the great , invisible state beyond the senses, a negoiation with death. His imagistic tilling of the semiotic field yields the sort of endless irony that makes for the kind of truly subversive comedy, a sort of satire that contains the straining cadences of prophecy. The city, the place where the the hydra-headed strands of commerce, history, technology and government merge in startling combinations of applied power, becomes an amorphous cluster of symbols whose life and vitality come to seem as fragile and short-lived as living matter itself.
The Time of Our Singing
a novel by Richard Powers
This amazing novel by Richard Powers. an ambitious generational tale of an American family with a mixed heritage of African-American and German Jew, and covers the travails, triumphs and tragedies of this family. There are three children, one with a beautiful singing voice who opts for a classical music career, a daughter who becomes involved with the civil rights struggle,and a second brother who, though gifted as well, buries his ambition to bridge the gap between his siblings. Not a perfect novel–sometimes Powers’ superb style turns into a list of historical events as a means to convey the sweep of time– but the central issues of race, identity, culture are handled well within the story. The writing is generous and frequently beautiful, especially at the moments when the description turns to the music. Powers, as well as any one, describes how notes played the right way can make one believe in heaven and the angels who live there.
Frantic Transmissions to and From Los Angeles
a memoir by Kate Braverman
Frantic Transmissions to and From Los Angeles is a memoir, of sorts, about growing up in Los Angeles, and then the eventual moving away from that famously center-less city. Writing in a high poetic and semiotically engaged style that recalls the best writing of Don DeLillo (Mao ll) and Norman Mailer (Miami and the Seize of Chicago), Braverman deftly defines isolated Los Angeles sprawl and puts you in those cloistered, cul-de-sac’d neighborhoods that you drive by on the freeway or pass on the commuter train, those squalid, dissociated blocks of undifferentiated houses and strip malls and store front churches; the prose gets the personal struggle to escape through any means , through art and rage, and this makes Frantic Transmissions not unlike Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, wherein the prodigal son or daughter deigns to move up and away from a home that cannot keep them, with only raw nerve and the transforming elements of art to guide them. What Braverman confronts and writes about with a subtly discerning wit is the struggle of defining the place one calls home, and what roles one is obliged to assume as they continually define their space, their refuge. All through this particularly gripping memoir there is the sheer magic and engulfing power of Braverman’s writing; I was fortunate to receive an uncorrected proof of Frantic Transmissions a couple of months ago, and I was knocked out by what I beheld. Sentence upon sentence, metaphor upon simile, analogy upon anecdote, this writing is rhythmic and full of stirring music. There is poetry here that does not overwhelm nor over reach; this is an amazing book, and it is one of the best books about life in Los Angeles , quite easily in the ranks of Nathaniel West, Joan Didion, and John Fante.
HIP:The History
non fiction by John Leland
John Leland’s Hip:The History is the sort of book I like to read on the bus, the portentous social study of an indefinite essence that makes the reader of the book appear, well, hip. This is the perfect book for the pop culture obsessive who wonders, indeed worries and frets over the issue as to whether white musicians can become real blues musicians or whether Caucasian jazz musicians have added anything of value to the the jazz canon besides gimmick.
Leland, a reporter for the New York Times, has done his research and brings together the expected doses of cultural anthropology, literature and, of course, music to bear on this sweeping, if unsettled account as to what “hip” is and how it appears to have developed over time. Most importantly he concentrates on the lopsided relationship between black and white, each group borrowing each other’s culture and suiting them for their respective needs; in the case of black Americans, rising from a slavery as free people in a racist environment, hip was an an ironic manner, a mode of regarding their existence on the offbeat, a way to keep the put upon psyche within a measure of equilibrium. For the younger white hipsters, in love black music and style, it was an attempt to gain knowledge, authenticity and personal legitimacy through a source that was Other than what a generation felt was their over-privileged and pampered class. Leland’s range is admirable and does a remarkable job of advancing his thesis–that the framework of what we consider hip is a way in which both races eye other warily–and is sensitive to the fact that for all the attempts of white artists and their followers to cultivate their own good style from their black influences, the white hipsters is never far from black face minstrelsy. For all the appropriation,experimentation, and varied perversions of black art that has emerged over the decades, there are only a few men and women who’ve attained the stature of their African American heroes, people who, themselves, were the few among the many.
The Silver Dazzle of the Sun
poems by Paul Dresman
The speakers are shaped by language that accommodates the vastness of region, The West, both as a physical place and collective social construction, looms large in a good deal of the present poems(as it is in Dorn’s long lines), and it is the marriage of voice and location that gives the poetry in The Silver Dazzle of the Sun a life that is absent from too much published poetry. The world climbs through the language and appears through deft description fresh as a moment of first perception; style is content, to beg an old question, but it’s a worthwhile distinction to make clear. Dresman’s work brings us a world of felt experience that can be addressed in useful ways. There are no epistemological quandaries here, no rueful mediations on malformed vowels. There is , though, plenty of wit, anger, flights of lyric speculation, writ with a sure composing hand.There is something of a medley of voices at play in these works, where a terrain on which innumerable generations of have written on emerge in a layered and subtly orchestrated music. The poetics of wonder, rage, joy and sorrow are harnessed with extraordinary skill. Above all else, the poems come from a voice that is speaking to you;
there are moments when the candor and unreticent wit of the writing makes you ponder again the incidents in your own experience that you might not have regarded for years. The poetry is that good.
Big If
a novel by Mark Costello
This is a superb comedy of contemporary American life involving a low-level Secret Service agent who finds she must get reacquainted with her computer-genius brother when she takes a respite from the paranoid turns and twists of her job. This is a book of richly skewed characters doing their best to make sense of their lives. Costello’s prose is alive with the things of our life, and is superb at demonstrating the clash between happiness material items promise and the world that denies such rewards. He is the master of setting forth a metaphor and letting it travel through a storyline just beneath the surface, operating silently, almost invisibly, always effectively.
Their father, in the first portion of the book , is a moderate Republican insurance investigator of scholarly reading habits who happens to be a principled atheist. You cannot have both insurance, the practice of placing a monetary remuneration on unavoidable disaster, and assurance, which has religion promising protection from evil and disaster. The children, in turn, assume careers that seem to typify the dualism their father opposed, son Jens becoming a programmer for the Big If on line game for which he writes “monster behavior code” that attempts to outsmart human players and have them meet a hypothetical destruction. Daughter Vi, conversely, becomes a Secret Service agent, schooled in the theory encoded in The Certainties, a set of writings that lays out the details, nuances and psychology of extreme protection. These are world views in collision, and Costellos’ prose is quick with the telling detail,the flashing insight, the cutting remark. On view in Big If are different models on which characters try to contain , control, or explain the relentless capriciousness of Life as it unfolds, constructs through which characters and the country and culture they serve can feel empowered to control their fate in a meaningful universe. The punchline is that Life goes on anyway, with it’s fluctuating, undulating, chaotic dynamics that only occasionally seem to fall into place. Costello wrests a subtle comedy of manners from the small failures of anyone’s world view to suitably make their existence unproblematic. This is a family comedy on a par with The Wapshot Chronicle, but in an America that is suddenly global, an air that makes even the most familiar things seem alien and fantastic. Costello is a modern master, and fans of White Noise and The Corrections will enjoy the emergence of a master.
It’s Go In Horizontal: Selected Poems 1974-2006
poems by Leslie Scalapino
Laying out a poem like it were a trail of bread crumbs a reader would to the bigger feast of The Point Being Made is not how writer Leslie Scalapino writes. As we find ourselves in a time when the popular idea of the poet and their work they compose seems slanted toward the lightly likable Billy Collins and others witing poems that can be grasped, shared, written out in a fine hand on perfumed paper and preserved between the leaves of a dictionary of quotations. Scalapino requires not the casual gaze but the harder view, the more inquisitive eye. Scalapino brings a refreshing complexity to her work, a sanguine yet inquisitive intelligence that is restless and dissatisfied with the seemingly authorized narrative styles poets are expected to frame their ideas with. The framing, so to speak, is as much the subject in her poems and prose, and the attending effort to interrogate the methods one codifies perception to the exclusion of details not fitting a convenient structure, Leslie Scalapino has produced a body of work of rare and admirable discipline; the writing is a test of the limits of generic representation.Her work as well is an inquiry in how we might exist without them. In as series of over nineteen books over published since the seventies, she has been one of the most interesting poets working , an earnest inquisitor of consciousness and form blurring and distorting the boundaries that keep poetry, prose, fiction and auto biography apart.It’s Go in Horizontal is a cogent selection from three decades of writing. The distinction blurring is not a project originating with her, but there is in Scalapino’s work the sense of a single voice rather than expected “car radio effect”, the audio equivalent of Burrough’s cut up method that would make a piece resemble an AM dial being moved up and down a distorted, static-laden frequency. Leslie Scalapino’s writing is one voice at different pitches responding to an intelligence aware of how it codes and decodes an object of perception. The work is fascinating , interrogations that wrestle with the act of witnessing.
The Collected Poems of Ted Berrigan
poems by Ted Berrigan
It’s not enough that we have the same first name and the same Irish second initial, my attraction to Berrigan’s poems was the rather unbelligerent way he ignored the constricting formalities in poetry and rendered something of a record of his thoughts unspooling as he walked through the neighborhood or went about his tasks. “Where Will I Wander” is the title of a recent John Ashbery volume, and it might well be an apt description of Berrigan’s style; shambling, personal, messy, yet able to draw out the sublime phrase or the extended insight from the myriad places his stanzas and line shifts would land on. The world radiated a magic and energy well enough without the poet’s talents for making essences clear to an audience needing to know something more about what lies behind the veil, and Berrigan’s gift were his personable conflations of cartoon logic, antic flights of lyric waxing, and darkest hour reflection , a poetry which, at it’s best, seemed less a poem than it did a monologue from someone already aware that their world was extraordinary and that their task was to record one’s ongoing incomprehension of the why of the invisible world.
The Age of Huts
poems by Ron Silliman
The Age of Huts brings together several books he’s published as a long standing project. It makes for alternately exhilarating and exasperating reading. Those who stay with Silliman and his task are rewarded with what is really the most thorough on going examination of the American vernacular since William Carlos Williams composed and assembled his central epic poem Paterson in 1963. Silliman’s is the language of a place, and there is a logic as the streams and eddies of unassigned sentences the blended variations at once rich, dissonant.
The Plot Against America
a novel by Philip Roth
Novelist Philip Roth, always a spiky and unpredictable story teller, creates an alternative history for America, a fascinating and troubling fantasy of “what if”: Charles Lindbergh, aviation hero and Nazi-sympathetic isolationist, is nominated by the Republican Party in the 1940 presidential election, and handily defeats FDR. Using his own family as the center of this fable, Roth has written a novel with the impact of a memoir of hard and terrible times,speaking to how easily a homegrown fascism could take root and grow. The power of Roth’s novel lies not only in the impressive historical research he brings to the novel, but especially in how creeping Totalitarian persecution effects the lives of characters who are complex, sympathetic, argumentative. This is not a dry recital of dates, events, names from fading ledgers and indexes, because the novel is a family saga among its several formations, and what Roth has done is highlight a family’s struggle between each other and their inner lives while the nation prepares to give in to its worse fears and lay the land for fascism. Several instances — the family listening the radio during the convention, a hapless father become less powerful in the children’s eyes as political forces move against American Jews, the subtly advanced symbolism of the fictional Philip Roth’s stamp collection– gives a reader an vivid accounting of the things that disrupted, destroyed, lost by systematized evil.
The Plot Against America is a masterpiece of the first rank, as relevant as morning headlines, timeless as great literature, qualities that place him, unexpectedly, in the same league with Sinclair Lewis.This is art as a form of truth-telling, of an acute paranoia made comprehensible through a focus of literary skill that gives voice to the unspeakable. Roth was obliviously raised to revere democracy , and this work, tempered by experience and the history of human kind to go wrong and become complicit in evil, sounds off a warning for the reader that is hardly an original thought but meaningful resounds even still: the price of freedom is constant vigilance because the enemies of our rights as citizens are snakes sleeping with one eye open.
The Body Artist
a novel by Don DeLillo
DeLillo is perhaps the best literary novelist we have at this time, which the career-defining masterwork Underworld made clear to his largest readership yet: at the end of all those perfect sentences , sallow images and and long, winding, aching paragraphs is a narrative voice whose intelligence engages the fractured nature of identity in a media-glutted age. The Body Artist has him contracting the narrative concerns to a tight, elliptical 128 pages, where the Joycean impulse to have a private art furnish meaning to grievous experience is preferred over the dead promises of religion and philosophy. What exactly the woman character does with her performance body art, what the point is of her ritualized , obsessed cleansing of her body, is a mystery of DeLilloian cast, but it’s evident that we’re witnessing to a private ritual whose codes won’t reveal themselves, but are intended as a way for the woman to again have a psychic terrain she can inhabit following the sudden and devastating death of her film maker husband. The entrance of the stranger in the cottage turns her aesthetic self-absorption , slowly but inevitably, into a search into her past in order to give her experience meaning, resonance, a project she quite handily ignores until then. The sure unveiling of her psychic life is a haunting literary event. DeLillo’s language is crisp, evocative, precise to the mood and his ideas: you envy his flawless grasp of rhythm and diction as these traits simultaneously make the cottage on the cold , lonely coast seem sharp as snap shot, but blurred like old memory, roads and forests in a foggy shroud. A short, haunted masterwork.
Crackpots
a novel by Sara Pritchard
Brief, beautifully written book about an awkward young girl being raised by an eccentric family. Note that there is no child abuse or other hot button stuff engineered in to make the book appeal to the Oprah book clubs, just a humorous and bittersweet novel of a girl, beset with any number of glum circumstances and embarrassments, maturing to a resilient adult with soft irony that gets her through the day. Pritchard is especially fine as prose stylist.
Half Life:Poems
poems by Meghan O’Rourke
Meghan O’Rourke,poetry editor for The Paris Review and a cultural editor for Slate,is also a poet with unique ability to get a nearly intangible notion, an inexlicapable sensation into words. Giving voice to hunch, making the half-idea a textured, tangible thing, hers is a poetry that completes sentences we cannot finish ourselves. Precision and morphological accuracy aren’t the point, and the words themselves, the images they create or suggest, are more like strands of half remembered music that is heard and triggers an intense rush of association; any number of image fragments, sounds, scents, bits of sentences, suggestions of seasonal light in a certain place, race and parade through the mind as fast as memory can dredge up the shards and let them loose. Just as fast, they are gone again, the source of quick elation or profound sadness gone; one can quite nearly sense that streaming cluster of associations that make up a large part of your existence rush onward, going around a psychic bend, scattering like blown dust in the larger universes of limitless life. All one is left with is memory of the sudden rush, the flash of clarity, and the rapid loss, the denaturing of one’s sense of self in a community where one might have assumed they were solid and autonomous in their style of being, that nothing can upset the steady rhythm of a realized life.
Submitted by Ted Burke Blog
This is a dreary reconfiguration of Augustine’s
stalled obsession over the
state of his body’s
peculiar refusal to adhere to God’s all inclusive
bitcheness, and the use of a substantial quote (to be polite) from the sainted
theologian against a
memoir of personal loss, the death of a parent, is
a
stretch and a strain.
It is wholly pretentious and dishonest, I think, and the intoning of successive suppositions, each of which is meant to make us pause and consider the limitless minutiae in which God’s animating force resides, becomes, as both reading and writing, a grind.What works well for a rapturing Confession does not make for a poem of the sort Gregorson attempted here; giving the section eccentric line breaks, to suggest rhythm to which the conditional phrases might hint at swaths of thick , slow liturgical musical will not give the borrowed writing a lift. Gregorson should have better paraphrased what she borrowed and have it better mirror the deferred narrator’s sad recollection of his (or her) mother passing away at an early age.
There was an opportunity for a revelation, when words written in complete abandon in an effort to sense a deity’s essence and purpose for the world slam up against real feelings from actual experience, with the glory of the literature is found wanting. Perhaps the transition from the uncited Augustine usage to the parallel scene where the dying mother announces “I do not know why I am here” less jarring. This is film school stuff, a quick cutting between past and current scenarios, and while the method is sometimes effective in the right writer’s hands, it is ineffective here.
The stitching of the two shows, and it’s a mismatched, and one realizes that writer having a hard time dealing with loss in clear language will often enough grease their syntax with the high-falutin’ references and rhetoric that sound unnatural and winds up communicating no feeling at all, no nuance in actual fact. Gregerson attempts is a pastiche between an t established text and and a recent memory, with an unsuccessful result. It would effective if , perhaps, if there were a suggestion of unexpected continuity between the past and present, and that there is a reason why we use similar narrative schemes through the periods to account for our interior experience. There can be something provocative in such a blur, with poetic resonance being a result.
We get instead a theory of a poem, an outline. The flaw here seems to be that Gregerson chose erudition for it’s own sake rather than use her reading as an enhancement to her senses, creating distance between her and the subject she sought to explore; the poem is self-reflexive in an uninteresting way, waxing on about literature’s limits. It’s a tired trope, really, and it’s time that more poets realize that most of us realize that literature is, of course, imperfect in getting to the distilled reality of experience. Perfection is not and should never be the intent in writing about something , just as literature ought to avoid itself as subject. It is the attempt to get to the heart of things that interests us.That is the essential goal of poetry, the expression of the inexpressible in terms of the unforgettable (to borrow from critic John Ciardi).
Submitted by Ted Burke Blog
I talked to someone earlier today about the Henri Cole poem “Dead Mother”, and it was remarked that the poem read more like a rehearsal of a response rather than a gathering of the conflicting emotions a parent’s death unleashes on you. It was remarked that that his may be the reason for the seeming foliage Cole circles his subject with.I agree that Cole is attempting to inoculate this poem against criticism by making the language abstruse, as opposed to abstract.
Abstruse , for me, means clutter, vagueness, a grandly arranged set of unconventionally phrased ideas that have the sound of a hollow tin can once their noise is made. Abstract language, in contrast, leads back to a referents, and everything can be discerned in an intricate network of relationships; the associations, obvious and less obvious, emerge from a careful reading of how unexpected things become analogies for unstated irresolution , or as metaphors for a larger theme the specific topic is only a symbol of.
Even in the tight reins of a sonnet, I suspect Cole sometimes lets his imagination get the better of him and leaves a personal association, a private pun , linger quizzically in a line on the pretext that a scholarly critic might catch it, inspect it, run a gamut of philological tests on the wording, and uncover a deep vein of insight and erudition that would make some latter day jaws hit the floor. It’s laziness, I think. The poem seems not an account of viewing a dead mother and experiencing a traumatic reaction than it is the work of someone trying to perfect their reaction; this seems about grief as gristle for the literary art , and that I think is this poem’s downfall. It’s over-thought, and not thought through.
Submitted by Ted Burke Blog
Submitted by Ted Burke Blog
The death of a loved one is not something that one just “gets over”, as if there were an expiration date on grief.Yes, one moves on with their life and tries to have new experiences and adventures, but poets, like anyone else, get older, and the longer view on their life and relations comes to the for. Poetry will tend to cease being the bright and chatty record of one’s impulses, leavened with fast wit and snappy references, and will become more meditative, slower, a more considered rumination on those who’ve are gone yet whose presence remains felt and which influences the tone and direction of the living. It’s hardly a matter of getting mileage from a tragedy as it is a species of thinking-out-loud. We speak ourselves into being with others around us to confirm our life in the physical world as well to confront the inescapable knowledge of our end, and poets are the ones writing their testaments that they were here once and that they lived and mattered in a world that is soon enough over run with another generation impatient to destroy or ignore what was here only scant years before so they may erect their premature monuments to themselves and their cuteness.We survived our foolishness and quick readings, a poet writes, we lived here and mattered to a community of friends and enemies in ways that no novel or epic production can capture, and we wish you the same luck, the chance to live long enough in this world you seek to fashion after your own image so you may write about your regrets, your failures, the things you didn’t get around to doing.
Despair isn’t the default position for poets to take as they get older; as I think is plain here, poets will in general treat their subject matter with more consideration, more nuance, more acuity as they age. The host of emotions, whether despair, elation, sadness, celebration, aren’t likely to alter, but the treatments are bound to be richer, deeper, darker. One has aged and one has experienced many more things since they were in their twenties, and convincingly casting off the same flippant riffs one did in their fifties as they had while a college freshman is a hard act to pull off, emphasis on “act”. One grows up, if they’re lucky, and acts their age. Acting one’s age doesn’t necessarily mean one becomes a crotchety old geezer yelling at kids to get off his (or her) lawn; those character traits are formed long before the onset of old age. But what I think is a given is that an aging poet would be inclined to be more thoughtful as he or she writes. And why shouldn’t they be. They have more experience to write about and to make sense of.
Submitted by Ted Burke Blog
The death of a loved one is not something that one just “gets over”, as if there were an expiration date on grief.Yes, one moves on with their life and tries to have new experiences and adventures, but poets, like anyone else, get older, and the longer view on their life and relations comes to the for. Poetry will tend to cease being the bright and chatty record of one’s impulses, leavened with fast wit and snappy references, and will become more meditative, slower, a more considered rumination on those who’ve are gone yet whose presence remains felt and which influences the tone and direction of the living. It’s hardly a matter of getting mileage from a tragedy as it is a species of thinking-out-loud. We speak ourselves into being with others around us to confirm our life in the physical world as well to confront the inescapable knowledge of our end, and poets are the ones writing their testaments that they were here once and that they lived and mattered in a world that is soon enough over run with another generation impatient to destroy or ignore what was here only scant years before so they may erect their premature monuments to themselves and their cuteness.We survived our foolishness and quick readings, a poet writes, we lived here and mattered to a community of friends and enemies in ways that no novel or epic production can capture, and we wish you the same luck, the chance to live long enough in this world you seek to fashion after your own image so you may write about your regrets, your failures, the things you didn’t get around to doing.
Despair isn’t the default position for poets to take as they get older; as I think is plain here, poets will in general treat their subject matter with more consideration, more nuance, more acuity as they age. The host of emotions, whether despair, elation, sadness, celebration, aren’t likely to alter, but the treatments are bound to be richer, deeper, darker. One has aged and one has experienced many more things since they were in their twenties, and convincingly casting off the same flippant riffs one did in their fifties as they had while a college freshman is a hard act to pull off, emphasis on “act”. One grows up, if they’re lucky, and acts their age. Acting one’s age doesn’t necessarily mean one becomes a crotchety old geezer yelling at kids to get off his (or her) lawn; those character traits are formed long before the onset of old age. But what I think is a given is that an aging poet would be inclined to be more thoughtful as he or she writes. And why shouldn’t they be. They have more experience to write about and to make sense of.
Submitted by Knocking from Inside Blog
The wind rumbled in last night
like heavy freight on an overpass.
No moans or whistles: just the growl
of bitter air and the tinkle of
frozen rose petals falling like tiny
scarlet windchimes.
The dead leaves felt it coming
days ago. They crept from my feet,
whispering anxiously with
cadaver tongues in a language
of sibilance and clicks. They
fear brittleness.
It’s here to stay in the bone forest
the grove of frozen fingers
the cold flesh blossoms
among the tongues that only speak in hissing whispers
all drowned in the echoes
of the rumbling wind.
Collection available! Knocking from Inside
Submitted by Knocking from Inside Blog
December fifth, and though the trees are bare
there’s still a rosebush with a late-blown bloom.
A trace of summer lingers here and there
a dab of red, a waft of scented air
a touch of August captured in perfume.
December fifth, and though the trees are bare
and dead leaves rustle down the concrete stair
a scarlet blossom braves the winter gloom.
A trace of summer lingers here and there
on bushes as disheveled as the hair
of sleepers roused from winter-darkened rooms.
December fifth, and though the trees are bare
defiant roses challenge the despair
of dead grass shaking out a seedless plume.
A trace of summer lingers here and there
although this morning, frost was everywhere
and on the calendar, these numbers loom:
December fifth. But though the trees are bare
a trace of summer lingers here and there.
Collection available! Knocking from Inside
Submitted by Ted Burke Blog
D.G.Wills Books in LaJolla, California is a long time mecca for book lovers who crave a shop with a varied and deep selection literature, poetry and philosophy sections .Owner Dennis Wills, whom I’ve known (in full disclosure) since he opened his shop in 1979, has besides keeping his doors open , presented San Diego with an impressive roster of world-class literary events over the last few decades. Lucky for the rest of us that some of the most notable personalities were taped for future reference and are now available on D.G. Wills Books’ own YouTube Channel, thanks to the curatorial efforts of bookstore associate and media specialist Bill Perrine. More of these remarkable events are being added. Meanwhile, enjoy the plenitude of what Wills hath wrought:Norman Mailer ,Allen Ginsberg,Oliver Stone, Billy Collins, Gore Vidal, Lawerence Ferlinghetti, Gary Snyder. I recommend checking back with channel from time to see who else has been added to this amazing and important archive of literary figures.
Submitted by Average Poet Blog
Everything I’ve written is a sham
a shadow of the failure that I am—
if only I could buy into the scam
that someone out there truly gives a damn
for any reason other than to spur
the image of themselves that they prefer
but frank critiques infrequently occur
when sugar-coated scribbles start to blur.
Submitted by Knocking from Inside Blog
You Know, my Friend, how I Took on this Task
To Seek the Essence in a Vintner’s Cask
That Holds it even as the Heart Confines
The Soul like Liquor in a Chemist’s Flask.
These Earthly Trials do but the Soul refine
Bring Spirit forth, as Fire that breathes on Wine
Producing thus a Purer Distillate
Partaking of that Nature most Divine.
At last the Spirit Sheds its Fleshly Weight
Then Fire dies Down, and Pressures soft Abate
While Essence Captured in a Coil of Glass
Must Cool and Gather to a Condensate.
As Essence must be Parted from the Mass
So Soul from Body in the End must Pass.
Collection available! Knocking from Inside
Submitted by Ted Burke Blog
T.S.Eliot and Ezra Pound weren’t friends of democracy,but they did their own style of the mash up –classical and pop styles and a preferring a diffusion of coherence rather than writing a series of unifying metaphors–in ways that would better express their idea of the fracturing of reality and the destruction of purpose in culture. Someone had said that poetry was “news that stayed news”, and some of us in the later decades saw fit to use that a declaration about the merging of Art and History , in the immediate guise of the New Journalists, our recent examples being Mailer, Wolfe, Hunter Thompson, Gay Talese.The New Journalists weren’t really the mob–mobs cannot , by nature, be democratic nor fair nor be able to devise a fair and just politics. I’d say they were more the guys at the end of the bar who stopped opining about the way things ought to be and got off the bar seat to enter an argument that started without them; they were going to straighten folks out. As it goes, they did provide an interesting altnerative narrative line to what gets called the Movement of History, a choice , up close view of the insanity, the ugliness and the egomania that was chewing at the margins of the Great Society and it’s aftershock.
Realty is both an indvidual and a collective endeavor, yes; whatever it may in fact be in God’s mind, we , as a species, cannot concieve of reality without a narrative line, a script. We are all stars in our own movie and everyone else is from central casting; reality is close to being a multiplex theatre with very thin walls between the auditoriums. Dialogue and sound effects bleed into each other’s plot lines. Pound and Eliot are interesting contrasts, one a windbag, a blowhard,a buttinski, a motor-mouthing gab-bag who happened to have some brilliant notions of how poetry can be made aesthetically and personally viable again, the other being a depressed, crabby, self conciously rigid individual who’s view of the cracked surface of culture gave us some haunting images that perfectly convey the despair and longing decades after they were written.
Both were closet autocrats, of course, and very conservative–neither was a fan of corporations nor capitalism, and it wouldn’t be so hard to imagine the current strains of the right wing characterizing these fellows as left wingers. A strange set of long-view bed fellows; two anti-semetic, totalitarian inclined poets who wind up writing stuff that dovetail comfortably with a Marxist analysis on the effect of capital on human relationships. Everyone brings their own dynamite to this party, blowing up the same thing for the same reason, but with each with a Jesus of a different name.
Submitted by Ted Burke Blog
I enjoy David Lehman’s mosaics of place names, mad jazz and painterly effect; there is an fabulous improvisation in his lines that performs an activity I think is poetry’s core province, which is testing language’s ability to accommodate experience and offer up perception in a manner that merits a second, third or a hundredth look at the daily things that surround us.There is what sounds like genuine surprise and glee when his pieces are at their best set of finessed pitches ;the interruptions or clipped notions work as layers of many references Lehman decides to associate; it’s a sloppy process, I suppose, but it’s one I’m partial too, taking Frank O’Hara as my foil. There is not enough time in this life to bemoan and decry what cannot be undone. You’re use of another writer’s phrase merely passively agrees with him. Lehman’s technique is more adventurous, more artful–he makes his borrowed references perform as he wants them to.
Submitted by Poets Who Blog
Anyone checked out Poetry Express? When I visited there were 60 members online at that particular moment. Seems to be a hopping site. Click here to visit them.
Submitted by World Class Poetry Blog
After reading 12-1/2 chapters of “A” by Louis Zukofsky, I’m convinced Zukofsky must have been a lunatic. Only such a person could have spent an entire life on a work such as “A”.
I’m sure “A” has some literary value, but in large part it is a mad rambling. Zukofsky has the ability to make me think, in one moment, that he is a genius, and in the next, a self-consumed cogitator. These may be qualities that endear me to him.
Chapter 12 drones on for 135 pages. Zukofsky’s poetics is difficult to comprehend, though on a fundamental level it is quite simple. He is able to take a visual and incorporate it into the text, adding an element to the art of poetry that so few other poets ever aspire to let alone succeed at. Then he’ll go on and on page after page in a prosaic style over the most mundane details. Parts of it read like Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance for eggheads. Other parts are like reading Gertrude Stein through a kaleidoscope. It would be fair to say that “A” can be described as a multi-textual composition – never stagnant, always moving, but not always engaging.
In my mind, Objectivist poetics, in which Zukofsky was a key and central player, is evidence of the downside of Ezra Pound’s influence. It could be the beginning of the disintegration of poetry as poetry. Though, truthfully, I think that disintegration began with the Imagists.
But the road forks and Pound’s positive influence can be traced through other channels (T.S. Eliot, William Carlos Williams and Marianne Moore).
When Zukofsky is good I find him to be real good, but when he slips off into intellectual perdition, which is often, he just blathers like a bad Language poet. No small wonder, the latter consider him a hero.
Nevertheless, I do find Zukofsky to have some admirable qualities. No. 1, his attention to the small words is commendable. So few poets today really understand the value of the small words (a, the, etc.). Just take them out of your text and see if you notice.
Another thing I admire about Zukofsky is his emphasis on form. While his prosaic style has a tendency to grate on my nerves, I am still always conscious that he is writing in form. His poetic structure is important and can’t go unnoticed. Varied, but important.
I think it is these two qualities that have given Zukofsky the moniker of “the poet’s poet’s poet”. He may be a bore on the page, but poets would do good to study him for an enhancement of their own sensibilities to language and form, the nuts and bolts of all poetic expression.
